More on "levels".

There was the "Third Way".
Then there is the "Tetrahedron".
We are talking "dimentionalism".
Not just to pun on "mention"alism, but maybe to point to Nominalism.
There is the left and the right and the partisan ship.
The point is that the answer may not be directly between them.
Even with three or four points, where is the answer?
Sanders and Trump "followers" reflect the point that it is not in the middle.

Then there is the quantum leap of "divided government" where partisanship is not the point.
It is that there are three (equal but separate"~") branches. 

With these in mind, the 5th "is out there".  Now that is almost a pun on an amendment.
If the left, right and middle were on an even plane, the fourth might be what might makes.
That might be the direction that followers think right.
Certainly Sanders and Trump don't have the same point, let alone the same plane.

Fn: for "levels" see "Thought Experiment".
Note: the partisan ship of power and the lemon plank.
Then there is the force of laws.

[6 - 3 - 16]

6-2-16
Zombie Run Fold Perspectivism

Thought experiment.

On the suggestion that there are different dimensions of a religion or ideology based on the do amicus [!] ...dynamics of political power, akin to my lemony ship it...*

*links and edits 5-23-16
[!] spell check LOL
(do amicus: auto fill)
[and labels]
[This originated from a comment that there are different "levels" of Islam. Well... there are certainly different perspectives on Christianity.  Do they really depend on whether they are in the majority politically?  This might open up an whole new bailiwick.  ( !?! Sanders and Trump "followers" and the rules.) ] 

Separate thought or tangent:  $13.50 Too muddle against the means.

5-28-16
Jennifer Rubin: Raw Story on Clinton Republicans
Michael Bourne: Salon on Bernie as Clinton VP
David Sloan Wilson: Evonomics on Corporate Evolutionism
Anne Gearan: (RSN) Washington Post on Sanders DNC platform (Cornel West)committer persons.

5-30-16
Perspective in Progress [ ? ]  (/)

Really?

Tonight Show on Kelly.
Gary Payton Era?
Trump on Egypt Air ask Hilary
Trump Secretary of State.

MTP Trump

Chuck Todd

Math Tutorial Perspective?  No! Math to Politics?
[flash notes]
I. Rigged system
II. change laws?
III.  Ryan chair.
IV. Coming together.
V. BP binding pledge
VI. Romney?
how world works
taxes
Minimum Wage  Competing States.
Hillary & politicians

Transition Team led by Christie.
Voters less likely to vote for Trump endorsers[!]

The 5th Dimention[!]

File to read.
FYI: time and politics are the 4th
Not to(o) Hegel, but the other three are physics, psychology & philosophy.

paragraph 2
objective / subjective related to grids?

paragraph 3
"now" is a calculus
Is "t" perpendicular to x, y, & z?
(see p2) how?

At least two of these

are relevant to recent reads and one confirms a suspicion of mine in reaction to a read.
Now the task is to re-view it.

Bread Crumbs

https://motherboard.vice.com/read/why-did-the-genetic-code-of-all-life-on-earth-suddenly-stop-evolving


https://motherboard.vice.com/read/scientists-think-intelligent-life-could-have-evolved-before-brains-slime-mold-learning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unreasonable_Effectiveness_of_Mathematics_in_the_Natural_Sciences

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MckuBQC6gKU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijjsjCv6k7w

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150803-physics-theories-map/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160324-in-newly-created-life-form-a-major-mystery/


-
5-8-16
-
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=para+digm

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/field-guide-to-defending-hillary-clinton-against-fake-scandals/24710/

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/05/06/3775910/hillary-clinton-faith-profile/

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36713-a-contested-convention-is-exactly-what-the-democratic-party-needs

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36702-david-brooks-discovers-income-inequality

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36742-point-of-no-return-obamas-legacy-in-the-middle-east

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/bernard-carr/time-and-consciousness_b_9855418.html?utm_content=bufferf22ec&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

test

Speaking of master ...
glitches...

http://www.salon.com/2016/05/02/its_time_to_get_real_about_the_obama_legacy_why_his_economic_record_is_much_more_complicated_than_either_party_wants_to_admit/?source=newsletter

http://www.salon.com/2016/05/02/geek_culture_is_home_to_some_of_the_biggest_assholes_ghostbusters_paul_feig_director_lashes_out_at_internet/?source=newsletter

http://www.salon.com/2016/04/30/clintonism_screwed_the_democrats_how_bill_hillary_and_the_democratic_leadership_council_gutted_progressivism/

oh yeah!!!
trolls
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/30/david_brooks_has_driven_me_mad_his_wacky_new_york_times_mea_culpa_is_a_master_trolls_finest_moment_yet/

Hardball...
Andrew Sullivan
Susan Page
Jeremy Peters

Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

Footnotes Page One May 2016

Nominalism:  5-30-16
Peter Abelard*: (b.s.) a. Too Random..., b. Literally, c.  In the Beginning,  d. GOT ED!
Theodicy: NFRY

*"Hence, Abelard concludes, universality is not an ontological feature of the world but a semantic feature of language."

Filed to Read.